|
|
Posted By Guest Author - Valerie M. Jundt, Managing Director, Keane UP,
Sunday, May 19, 2013
Updated: Friday, May 17, 2013
|
For those of us
working in unclaimed property reporting, we all know the importance of
accuracy. If you miss a filing deadline or fail to include all applicable
critical information on the report, then you might be facing an audit,
penalties or (in some states) misdemeanor charges.
UPPO is committed to
providing the most timely, accurate information for unclaimed property holders,
helping you take the guesswork out of reporting and making it easier for you to
comply with all relevant state laws and deadlines.
Here are the five
common reporting errors that holders make, along with advice on how to mitigate
those errors. More information on unclaimed property reporting is available at UPPO.org.
1) Reporting and remitting unclaimed
property to the wrong jurisdiction
With 54 U.S.
reporting jurisdictions and a patchwork of different laws and deadlines, it is
not always easy to determine the proper state or territory for reporting and
remitting unclaimed property.
There are
three considerations when trying to ascertain the appropriate jurisdiction for
reporting:
- State
of the owner’s last known address
- State
of the holder’s incorporation or domicile, if the owner’s address is not known
- State
of holder’s incorporation or domicile if the address of the apparent owner is
in a foreign country AND if the holder is incorporated or domiciled in the U.S.
Depending on
the state law, holders may be obligated to report unclaimed property in all
jurisdictions that apply, using the criteria listed above. Check your state’s reporting guidelines to be certain.
2) Failing to include all relevant
property types, including liabilities that may be held by a third-party agent
Unclaimed
property is a wide-ranging "umbrella” term and can include many different types
of tangible and intangible personal property. Property types include, but are
not limited to:
|
-
Un-cashed
checks
-
Deposits
-
Customer
credits
-
Refunds
-
Unapplied
payments
-
Dormant
accounts
-
Benefit
payments
-
Accounts
receivable
-
Accounts
payable
-
Retirement
assets
-
Un-cashed
payroll
-
Unidentified
cash/credits
|
-
Retirement
assets
-
Workers’
Comp
-
Travelers’
checks
-
Matured
bonds
-
Un-exchanged
shares
-
Unpaid
dividends
-
Underlying
stock
-
Other
general ledger items
-
Tangible
property (safe deposit box contents)
-
Commissions
-
Rebates
-
Mineral-related
property
|
If you
outsource certain payment functions to a third party (TPA); such as a Transfer
Agent (to manage securities, dividend payments, proxies); payroll functions,
rebates, etc…it is critical that the contract specifically spells out the
responsibility for unclaimed property responsibilities. If the responsibility is assigned to the
contractor, it is important to periodically test for compliance and insist on
obtaining copies of the reports that have been filed on your behalf. At the end of the day, while you may be
outsourcing the "function”, ensuring compliance is your responsibility. Should your company change TPAs or the TPA
cease doing business or merge with another company you could be at risk of
losing critical data that will ultimately be needed to further confirm that
your company is in compliance.
3) Failure to properly address and
consider successor liability
Holders may
be successors that assume the liability for property created by prior
companies. Corporations that grow through acquisitions often have liability for
unclaimed property that originated with their acquired businesses. These acquired
businesses probably did not file unclaimed property reports for all categories
of property, but the states assert that any unclaimed property obligations
would likely shift from the successor business. The successor may be successful
in showing that it acquired only certain assets and not the stock, but if the
acquisition was by purchase or exchange of stock, then the state will assert
the corporation is responsible for all liabilities including the unclaimed
property.
Sorting out
successor liability can be difficult, and staff and outside counsel will need sufficient
time to research the facts and law that apply to each corporate merger or acquisition.
These problems can be reduced if unclaimed property issues are first considered
during the consolidation phase. Again, a suggested best practice is to request
copies of the various unclaimed property reports that were filed by the
acquired company prior to or in conjunction with the transition.
4) Filing your report "off cycle” (i.e.,
with an incorrect due date)
Annual
reports are due to most states in the fall, with some state laws requiring a
spring reporting period as well. The majority of the states outline due
diligence requirements to be performed no less than 90 days and no more than
120 days prior to the reporting deadline. Depending on the property type and
the state’s individual guidelines, some states may require notifications to be
made by certified mail and/or advertising.
There are
many unique differences and requirements among states. Reporting property too
early, with an incorrect report cycle or due date, or failure to comply with
other elements of a state unclaimed property statute can result in fines and/or
interest being assessed to the holder. States such as Texas and Michigan
recently modified their reporting due dates to July 1 of each year. Check
state reporting guidelines to ensure compliance with individual filing
schedules and deadlines.
5) Failure to update systems and
processes to incorporate changes in various state laws, dormancy periods, due
diligence requirements and reporting formats
State laws regarding unclaimed property requirements are changing on a regular basis and often include essential information
about the reporting process, including look-back periods, dormancy periods and
even the types of files that are accepted as documentation. Staying on top of
changes in state statutes can be time-consuming, but ultimately less work than
being subject to an audit, fines or other penalties.
An online service – govWATCH
– provides weekly email updates of state legislative activity related to
unclaimed property, with customizable alerts and search features available to
simplify tracking changes in state laws. A govWATCH subscription is included as
a membership benefit when joining UPPO. The
UPPO Government Relations team also provides a summary of the news and
information, making it relevant and applicable to your daily work.
UPPO members and non-members can learn more about common
unclaimed property reporting errors, plus dozens of other topics, at the annual
UPPO Holders Seminar, August 14-15, 2013 in Chicago. Register today and receive an early-bird discount. OTHER RESOURCES State Unclaimed Property Information (NAUPA) Securities Transfer Association (STA) govWATCH The analysis and opinions expressed
herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
views of the Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization or its
officers, directors or members. This summary document provides
background information and is not intended as a substitute for legal
advice.
Tags:
Compliance
Due Diligence
education
FAQs
Reporting
UP101
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By GRAC Member, Michael Rato,
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Updated: Wednesday, May 08, 2013
|
When UPPO issued its last Regulatory UP-Date in January, the headline item was about
Delaware: specifically, the creation of a new (and temporary) Voluntary Disclosure Agreement program
run by the Secretary of State’s office. While that program has received a
significant amount of publicity from the state, service providers, and the
unclaimed property media (to the extent that there is such a thing), the first
third of the year has also seen a variety of other legislative developments
that may be of interest to holders in particular industries or states. We
encourage you to follow UPPO’s govWATCH
for the most up to date information, but below is a sampling of some of legislative
changes that have already been enacted in 2013.
Developments for
Insurers
The past few years have seen substantial regulatory
developments relating to life insurers, and this year seems to be continuing
that trend. For example, on March 29, Montana enacted the "Unclaimed Life
Insurance Benefits Act” (Montana
Senate Bill 34), which will require insurers and related entities,
starting next year, to compare their policies against the Social Security
Administration’s death master file (or a similar database) on a semiannual
basis. Similar searches will be required in New Mexico beginning July 1 of this
year, and in North Dakota before next November, as a result of legislation that
passed in those states (New Mexico
Senate Bill 312, enacted April 1; North
Dakota House Bill 1171, enacted April 30). Back on the East Coast,
insurers in the Empire State will be required to make these searches on a
quarterly basis as a result of NY
Assembly Bill 1831, enacted March 15.
Gift Cards
There have also been a few developments relating to gift
cards. In Colorado, new legislation (Colorado
House Bill 1102, enacted March 15) created a reporting exemption for
"small” issuers of gift cards, providing that holders selling less than
$200,000 per year of gift cards are not required to report unclaimed cards to
the state. Also of note, the newly created Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (CFPB) published its long awaited determination concerning
whether Maine and Tennessee unclaimed property laws relating to gift cards are
preempted by federal law. UPPO’s earlier coverage of the decision can be found here, but in short, the CFPB
ruled that all of the applicable laws were valid and enforceable with the
exception of one provision of the Tennessee Act that would permit an issuer to
refuse to honor a gift card as soon as two years from the date of issuance
(which is inconsistent with provisions of federal law generally requiring most gift
cards to remain valid for at least five years).
Process and Procedure
A number of bills signed into law thus far this year deal
with the procedural nuts and bolts of reporting, remitting, and/or claiming
abandoned property. In Florida, Senate
Bill 464 (enacted April 30) allows the Department of Financial Services
to accept owner claims electronically. Conversely, Indiana Senate Bill 222 (enacted April 12) will require
holders to report property electronically. That law also purports to change the
priority rules (and other requirements) for safe deposit box items, providing
that Indiana may take custody of both (a) abandoned safe deposit boxes in
Indiana and (b) abandoned safe deposit boxes outside of Indiana held for
Indiana residents. In Alabama, House
Bill 112 made a wide variety of changes – substantive and procedural –
to Alabama’s Unclaimed Property Act. UPPO’s earlier overview of that
legislation can be found here.
Two unclaimed property bills have been passed in North Dakota, one adding a
definition of "money orders” to the Unclaimed Property Act (North Dakota House Bill 1162,
approved April 1), the other allowing the state to contract with private
parties to perform audits where the state has "reason to believe” a holder has
not complied with the Act (North
Dakota Senate Bill 2058, approved March 14).
Although Delaware has grabbed most of the headlines in 2013
thus far, other state legislatures have also been busy in the unclaimed
property area. We encourage you to consult govWATCH
for the most up-to-date information. OTHER RESOURCES govWATCH Michael Rato - LinkedIn
The analysis and opinions expressed
herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
views of the Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization or its
officers, directors or members. This summary document provides
background information and is not intended as a substitute for legal
advice.
Tags:
Advocacy
Compliance
Due Diligence
Gift Cards
Insurance
Members
Policy
UP Laws
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Sunday, May 05, 2013
Updated: Friday, May 03, 2013
|
At
our Annual Conference last month in San Diego, UPPO awarded its first $1,000 UPPO
Scholarship to Ann Hopkins, daughter of UPPO member Chris Hopkins with Crowe Horwath, LLP. Ann is a currently a sophomore at Penn State
University and a prospective nuclear engineering major. As a Scholar of the
Schreyer Honors College at Penn State, Ann is aiming for success! 
UPPO’s Board of Directors established the UPPO
Scholarship Program to assist
UPPO members and members’ children who plan to continue their education in
college or vocational school programs. Renewable
scholarships are offered each year for full-time study at an accredited
institution of the student’s choice.
The renewable nature of the UPPO Scholarship means that
recipients are eligible to receive the award for up to four years or a maximum
of $4,000 provided they maintain their eligibility.
UPPO has established a UPPO Scholarship Committee that is
responsible for fund raising and oversight of the program. A third-party
administrator, Scholarship Management Services, administers the program.
To raise money to support the Scholarship Program, UPPO held
its first fundraiser at the Annual Conference with a 5K Fun Run/Walk. More than
130 attendees supported the event and three of our members donated additional
corporate contributions to further support the program. The winners of the 5K
event were Kelvin Lawrence, Jason Higginbotham
and Chris Jensen for the men and Elizabeth Webb, Teresa Miller and Nicole Davis for the women! Congratulations to them and to ALL who
supported the Scholarship Program. 
Are you or your dependent(s) potential candidates for the
UPPO Scholarship Program? Check out the eligibility requirements. UPPO will
notify all member representatives when the 2013 application period opens. All
applications must be postmarked by December 31, 2013. UPPO’s third party
administrator will select the award recipient in early 2014 and the scholarship
award will be announced at UPPO’s 2014 Annual Conference in Dallas. OTHER RESOURCES UPPO Scholarship Program
The analysis and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization or its officers, directors or members. This summary document provides background information and is not intended as a substitute for legal advice.
Tags:
Members
News
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Administration,
Friday, April 26, 2013
|
Representatives from UPPO and unclaimed property leaders
from across the country joined members of a Uniform Law Commission (ULC) study
committee on Wednesday, April 24 in Washington, D.C. for a stakeholders meeting
to discuss possible review and revision of the Uniform Unclaimed Property Act (UUPA).
Changes to the UUPA – which was last updated in 1995 – would
have a significant impact on unclaimed property holders, as well as state
administrators and lawmakers. Wednesday’s meeting was designed for the ULC’s study
committee to gather viewpoints from a broad assemblage of stakeholders and
evaluate the input before reporting back to the ULC’s Scope and Project
Committee with a recommendation.
The ULC will make its final determination about whether or
not to revise the UUPA during its 2013 annual conference in July.
The preliminary feedback shared at the meeting was
incredibly useful as a starting point for discussions about revising the UUPA,
and nearly all participants agreed on a need for some sort of revision. So much
has changed since 1995, including information resources like the Internet and
digital record-keeping rendering many portions of the UPPA outdated or unclear.
Other issues discussed during the meeting included:
- The need for more clarity and uniformity in
reporting requirements.
- The need for better and timelier outreach to
reunite owners/heirs with their property earlier in the process.
- The use and acceptance of electronic methods for
owner contact and due diligence.
- Review of the activity standard for triggering
dormancy periods.
- How advances in technology, legal decisions,
competing statutes and federal regulations require a review of the current
UUPA.
To help the unclaimed property community better understand
and navigate any proposed UUPA changes, UPPO will be hosting a Uniform Law
Commission webinar on Wednesday, May 22 at 1:00 p.m. EDT.
During the webinar, UPPO President Karen Anderson from Unclaimed Property Recovery and Reporting, LLC,
UPPO Government Relations and Advocacy Committee Co-Chair Kendall Houghton with
Alston
& Bird LLP and UPPO First Vice President Debbie Zumoff with Keane will provide attendees
with an overview of the April 24 ULC stakeholders meeting, including a listing
of some of the issues presented by stakeholders as potential areas for
amendments or inclusion in a revised UUPA and discuss the ULC’s potential next steps.
Multiple employees are welcome to participate with only one
webinar connection, and one CPE credit is available upon completion.
Subscribe
to UPPO Focus and stay informed about breaking news from the Uniform Law
Commission regarding the UUPA. The analysis and opinions expressed
herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
views of the Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization or its
officers, directors or members. This summary document provides
background information and is not intended as a substitute for legal
advice.
Tags:
Advocacy
Due Diligence
education
Members
Policy
UP Laws
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
Posted By Bellmont Partners/Administration,
Sunday, April 14, 2013
Updated: Friday, April 12, 2013
|
Welcome to
another post in the Unclaimed Property 101 series. If
you’re new to the field, or perhaps need a refresher on the basics, this series
is for you. In our last post we covered, "What IS Unclaimed Property?” In this
post, we’ll examine two more topics:
- Who is responsible for reporting unclaimed
property?
- How does property become abandoned?
Who is responsible for reporting unclaimed
property?
Unclaimed
property must be reported to the state. But who is responsible for doing the
reporting? The short answer is every "holder” of unclaimed funds is required to
report them. A "holder” is loosely defined as any individual, business
association, governmental subdivision, estate, trust or any other type of legal
or commercial entity in possession of property that belongs to another or is
indebted to another according to most state laws.
While there
are some exemptions that may apply, you may be surprised to learn that organizations
such as governmental entities, cooperatives and Internal Revenue Code Sec.
501(c)(3) charities are typically held to the same unclaimed property
standards. Most states do not provide any unclaimed property reporting
exemption for special government or charitable entities – even if they are
tax-exempt. Many organizations, especially 501(c)(3) charities, are caught off
guard by this and learn the hard way that they were supposed to be filing
unclaimed property reports. If you have outstanding unclaimed funds that you’re
holding, don’t assume you’re exempt; make sure you do research to ensure that
is indeed the case and that you’re not in violation of state laws.
The bottom
line: If your state or the state where you should be reporting the funds does
not specifically exempt your type of entity, then you must file unclaimed
property reports.
How does property become abandoned?
Every year,
there is an enormous amount of unclaimed property waiting to be claimed. With
all of the tools and systems in place today, you may wonder how on earth such a
large amount of money and assets becomes misplaced or abandoned. There are many
factors at play that contribute to the issue. A few examples:
- Companies go through system conversions, and
perhaps all the accounting information doesn’t transfer correctly. All of the
sudden, you’re not sure who the property belongs to anymore.
- Owners move without forwarding address. You may
see this a lot in fields in which employees change jobs and move often, such as
the restaurant industry.
- Owners simply forget that you have their funds.
For example, if you opened a savings account as a teenager and there’s a very
small amount of money sitting in it today, that’s incredibly easy to forget. On
the other end of the spectrum, consider our country’s aging population. As
people grow older, they may find it more difficult to remember and keep track
of their investments – especially if the spouse who was more hands-on with the
family’s finances passes away.
- Physical documents representing property are
lost (such as passbooks, CDs, stock certificates, etc.). As we move to more
digital systems, this will hopefully become less of an issue.
Other
examples include name changes, deaths and cases in which a company that your
organization owes money to goes out of business or declares bankruptcy.
If you’re interested in learning more about the
basics of unclaimed property, take a look at our Unclaimed Property 101 webinar
and our Glossary of Unclaimed Property Terms. ADDITIONAL RESOURCE UPPO Unclaimed Property Tools UPPO Holders Seminar - August 14-15 The analysis and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Unclaimed Property Professionals Organization or its officers, directors or members. This summary document provides background information and is not intended as a substitute for legal advice.
Tags:
Compliance
education
FAQs
Members
UP101
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
|
|